Editorial standards

Useful first. Evidence where it matters.

Shift should sound like a human being without treating medical accuracy as optional.

Different claims get different scrutiny

Medicines, surgery & mental health

High-scrutiny content. UK status, safety, evidence and access claims are checked against authoritative sources and primary evidence where appropriate.

Calculators & decision tools

The maths, assumptions, methodology and limitations remain available beside the useful result.

Lifestyle & practical guidance

Evidence-aware and proportionate, written for normal life rather than dressed up as individual clinical advice.

Named responsibility

Substantive guides identify Matt O’Brien as the writer and researcher. Material health claims link to the authoritative sources supporting them, and regulated diagnosis or prescribing remains the responsibility of the relevant healthcare provider.

Sources

For health and treatment topics we prioritise authoritative UK guidance, regulators, product information and primary research where appropriate. Sources should let a reader inspect the basis of an important claim rather than simply trust the brand.

Commercial separation

Commercial relationships do not buy an editorial conclusion. Relevant relationships are disclosed, and Finder/comparison logic must not favour a route because of margin.

Corrections

Material factual or safety errors are corrected promptly and the affected content is rechecked rather than left stale.

Tone

Plain English, no fake certainty, no generic “AI voice”, no lecturing. Explain the useful answer first; put the deeper evidence underneath for the reader who wants it.